Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.4s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 68.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.0s Calculated | 36.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 779km484mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,593mm102in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 392L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,237L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 175g/km | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 4,500 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.0 s | 36.1 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI has 40 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 6.3 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 779 km 484 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.3 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 779 km 484 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 175 g/km | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Has 40 hp more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 223 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 299 km (186 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 41 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























