Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 68.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.2s Calculated | 36.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 968km601mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,593mm102in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 392L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,237L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.2 s | 36.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI has 50 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.2 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 968 km 601 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 968 km 601 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 223 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 111 km (69 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























