Volkswagen Tiguan I
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score93/100
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,591kg3,508lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,230kg4,916lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 68.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.4s Calculated | 36.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 744km462mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,427mm174in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,809mm71in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,686mm66in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,604mm103in | 2,593mm102in |
| Front track | 1,570mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 392L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 1,237L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.4 s | 36.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 7.2 s |
Although Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI: 3.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 744 km 462 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 744 km 462 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 78 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 111 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 334 km (208 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























