Volkswagen Teramont · Facelift 2021
Car comparison
Volkswagen Teramont · Facelift 2021 380TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI
- Lightest1,279 kg2,820 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range926 km575 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Volkswagen Teramont Facelift 2021 380TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score45/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 1,279kg2,820lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 57.8s Calculated | 59.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 805km500mi Calculated | 926km575mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 5,052mm199in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,989mm78in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,773mm70in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 2,590mm102in |
| Front track | - | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,541mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 286L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,415L | 1,290L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Teramont Facelift 2021 380TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | 4,900-6,700 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 57.8 s | 59.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont Facelift 2021 380TSI has 70 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont Facelift 2021 380TSI: 70 hp (52 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | 2,090 kg 4,608 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 1,279 kg 2,820 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Teramont Facelift 2021 380TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont Facelift 2021 380TSI: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | 805 km 500 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 926 km 575 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,090 kg 4,608 lb | 1,279 kg 2,820 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 805 km 500 mi | 926 km 575 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Teramont Facelift 2021 380TSI | Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.22 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,284 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Teramont Facelift 2021 380TSI
- Has 70 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI
- Is 811 kg lighter
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 121 km (75 mi) more estimated range
- Has 159 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























