Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range893 km555 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,601kg3,530lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.6s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 75.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.8s Calculated | 59.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 866km538mi Calculated | 893km555mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,509mm178in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,684mm66in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,679mm105in | 2,590mm102in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | 161mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,290L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 127g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.8 s | 59.0 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 142 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has 40 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,601 kg 3,530 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 866 km 538 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 893 km 555 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,601 kg 3,530 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 866 km 538 mi | 893 km 555 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 127 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI
- Is 251 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 km (17 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























