Volkswagen Tayron I
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful186 hp139 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Best estimated range896 km556 mi
- Largest trunk506 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 186hp139kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 75.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.3s Calculated | 59.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 896km556mi Calculated | 893km555mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,595mm181in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,731mm108in | 2,590mm102in |
| Front track | - | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 161mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 506L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,290L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 127g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.3 s | 59.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 142 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 186 hp 139 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI has 36 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI: 36 hp (27 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 8.7 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 8.4 s |
Although Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 896 km 556 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 893 km 555 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 186 hp 139 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 186 hp 139 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 896 km 556 mi | 893 km 555 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 127 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 506 L 17.9 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI | Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI
- Has 36 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 3 km (2 mi) more estimated range
- Has 61 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI
- Is 250 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























