Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed208 km/h129 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI
- Lightest1,330 kg2,932 lb
- Best power-to-weight113 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range943 km586 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,787kg3,940lb | 1,330kg2,932lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated | 75.0s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.3s Calculated | 58.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 811km504mi Calculated | 943km586mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,590mm102in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 615L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 121g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 3,940-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,940 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.3 s | 58.8 s |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI has 30 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 811 km 504 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 943 km 586 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.7 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 811 km 504 mi | 943 km 586 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 121 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI
- Is 457 kg lighter
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 133 km (82 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























