Volkswagen T-Roc I
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Cross
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range809 km503 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI
- Lightest1,255 kg2,767 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,255kg2,767lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 80.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 49.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 809km503mi Calculated | 755km469mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,234mm167in | 4,235mm167in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,782mm70in |
| Height | 1,573mm62in | 1,584mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,590mm102in | 2,551mm100in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,512mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 455L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,290L | 1,281L |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 121g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,180 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 49.9 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI has 40 hp more than Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 1,255 kg 2,767 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 809 km 503 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 755 km 469 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,255 kg 2,767 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 809 km 503 mi | 755 km 469 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 121 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 54 km (34 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























