Volkswagen T-Cross
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
2.0 TDI SCR
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,249 kg2,754 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,064 km661 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,249kg2,754lb | 1,440kg3,175lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 80.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.7s Calculated | 62.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 1,064km661mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,235mm167in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,584mm62in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,551mm100in | 2,590mm102in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 161mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,281L | 1,290L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 123g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | - | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 3,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.7 s | 62.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 1,249 kg 2,754 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 8.2 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR and Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 769 km 478 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 1,064 km 661 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,249 kg 2,754 lb | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 1,064 km 661 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 123 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI
- Is 191 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
- Has 90 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 295 km (183 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























