Volkswagen Sharan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Touran II
1.5 TSI ACT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk885 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score96/100
Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,018 km632 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 100.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 93.2s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.2s Calculated | 59.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 156Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 1,018km632mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,854mm191in | 4,527mm178in |
| Width | 1,904mm75in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,720mm68in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,919mm115in | 2,786mm110in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,617mm64in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 156mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 885L | 834L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,430L | 1,980L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 196g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.2 s | 59.0 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI has 50 hp more than Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT and Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT and Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 833 km 518 mi |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 1,018 km 632 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.3 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 1,018 km 632 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 196 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 885 L 31.3 cu ft | 834 L 29.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 51 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
- Is 365 kg lighter
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 184 km (114 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























