Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) · Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8vsVolkswagen Polo VI GTI R5 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Polo VI
GTI R5 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI R5 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,095 kg2,414 lb
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI R5 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 235Nm173lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,095kg2,414lb | 1,230kg2,712lb |
| Gross weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 35.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.7s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 325Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 570km354mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,781cc109cu in | 1,614cc98cu in |
| Length | 3,916mm154in | 4,067mm160in |
| Width | 1,650mm65in | 1,942mm76in |
| Height | 1,459mm57in | 1,372mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,466mm97in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,434mm56in | 1,837mm72in |
| Rear track | 1,426mm56in | 1,837mm72in |
| Trunk volume | 270L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,030L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | - |
| Fuel tank | 45L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Polo VI GTI R5 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 5,500 rpm | 1,950 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI R5 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI R5 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.7 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI R5 1.6 | 272 hp 203 kW |
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI R5 1.6 has 92 hp more than Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8 and Volkswagen Polo VI GTI R5 1.6: 92 hp (69 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 235 Nm 173 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI R5 1.6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 1,095 kg 2,414 lb |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI R5 1.6 | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI R5 1.6 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 7.5 s |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI R5 1.6 | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Polo VI GTI R5 1.6 and Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8: 3.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI R5 1.6 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI R5 1.6 | 272 hp 203 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI R5 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI R5 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 235 Nm 173 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,095 kg 2,414 lb | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 570 km 354 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI R5 1.6
- Has 92 hp more
- Has 165 Nm more
- Is 3.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 57 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























