Car comparison

Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5vsVolkswagen Phaeton Long · Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II

2.0 T5

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2010-2013
VS

Volkswagen Phaeton Long · Facelift 2010

3.0 V6 TDI

240 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2010-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    1,542 kg
    3,400 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    156 hp/t
    116 kW/t
    6.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 II2.0 T5VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
Power
240hp179kW
240hp179kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,542kg3,400lb
2,240kg4,938lb
Gross weight
2,040kg4,497lb
2,830kg6,239lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
69.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
88.1s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
24.6s
Calculated
32.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
854km531mi
Calculated
1,059km658mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
2,967cc181cu in
Length
4,628mm182in
5,179mm204in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,903mm75in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
3,001mm118in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,630mm64in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,617mm64in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
120mm5in
Trunk volume
380L
500L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
90L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDIPowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-5,000 rpm5,750 rpm
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI4,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 II2.0 T5VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.6 s
32.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
100 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
240 hp
179 kW
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
240 hp
179 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
1,542 kg
3,400 lb
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
2,240 kg
4,938 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T57.3 s
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI8.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5 and Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5 and Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
854 km
531 mi
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
1,059 km
658 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
240 hp
179 kW
7.3 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,628 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
5,179 mm
203.9 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.3 s
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 II2.0 T5VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,542 kg
3,400 lb
2,240 kg
4,938 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,628 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
5,179 mm
203.9 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
854 km
531 mi
1,059 km
658 mi
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II 2.0 T5Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km14.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi23.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year2,231 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5

  • Is 698 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI

  • Has 180 Nm more
  • Has 204 km (127 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 120 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5
Volkswagen Phaeton Long 3.0 V6 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
3.0 V6 TDI
4.2 V8
VS
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDIvsVolkswagenPhaetonFacelift 20104.2 V8
2.0 T5
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
3.0 V6 TDI
4.2 i V8 40V
VS
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDIvsVolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V
2.0 T5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
3.0 V6 TDI
4.2 V8
VS
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDIvsVolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8
2.0 T5
2.5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoS40 II2.5
3.0 V6 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDIvsVolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
3.0 V6 dCi
VS
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5vsRenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi
3.0 V6 TDI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDIvsVolkswagenPhideon380TSI
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoS902.0 T5
3.0 V6 TDI
3.2 V6 FSI
VS
VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDIvsVolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5 vs Volkswagen Phaeton Long · Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster