Volkswagen Passat Variant (B5)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B5) 2.8 30V SyncrovsVolkswagen Passat Alltrack (B7) 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Passat Alltrack (B7)
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B5) 2.8 30V Syncro
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B7) 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk588 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B5)2.8 30V Syncro | VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,707kg3,763lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,270kg5,004lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 64.7s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.0s Calculated | 39.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 791km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,771cc169cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,675mm184in | 4,771mm188in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,459mm57in | 1,550mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,703mm106in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,498mm59in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,500mm59in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 495L | 588L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,716L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Passat Variant (B5) 2.8 30V Syncro: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B7) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B5)2.8 30V Syncro | 6,000 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B5)2.8 30V Syncro | VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.0 s | 39.0 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B5)2.8 30V Syncro | 193 hp 144 kW |
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B7) 2.0 TSI has 17 hp more than Volkswagen Passat Variant (B5) 2.8 30V Syncro.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Passat Variant (B5) 2.8 30V Syncro and Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B7) 2.0 TSI: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B5)2.8 30V Syncro | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B5)2.8 30V Syncro | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI | 1,707 kg 3,763 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B5)2.8 30V Syncro | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B5)2.8 30V Syncro | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
Although Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B7) 2.0 TSI has more power, Volkswagen Passat Variant (B5) 2.8 30V Syncro is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B5)2.8 30V Syncro | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B5)2.8 30V Syncro | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.8 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B5)2.8 30V Syncro |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B5)2.8 30V Syncro | VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,707 kg 3,763 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 791 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 495 L 17.5 cu ft | 588 L 20.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B7) 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B5) 2.8 30V Syncro
- Is 212 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B7) 2.0 TSI
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 93 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























