Volkswagen Passat (B6)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSIvsVolkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta V
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk541 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Lightest1,391 kg3,067 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range696 km433 mi
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,391kg3,067lb |
| Gross weight | 2,270kg5,004lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 63.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s Calculated | 26.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 694km431mi Calculated | 696km433mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,168cc193cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,765mm188in | 4,554mm179in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,472mm58in | 1,459mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,709mm107in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,551mm61in | 1,512mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 114mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 541L | 527L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,067L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 6,250 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 26.2 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 250 hp 186 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI has 50 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 1,391 kg 3,067 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI and Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 694 km 431 mi |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 696 km 433 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,391 kg 3,067 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 694 km 431 mi | 696 km 433 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 541 L 19.1 cu ft | 527 L 18.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI | Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Passat (B6) 3.2 V6 FSI
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 14 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Is 194 kg lighter
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 km (1 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























