Volkswagen Golf VIII · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Volkswagen Golf VIII · Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSIvsVolkswagen Golf VII (5-DOOR) · Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Golf VII (5-DOOR) · Facelift 2017
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Golf VIII Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,301 kg2,868 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk381 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Volkswagen Golf VII (5-DOOR) Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,301kg2,868lb | 1,395kg3,075lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 85.3s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.9s Calculated | 50.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,020km634mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,282mm169in | 4,258mm168in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | 1,799mm71in |
| Height | 1,483mm58in | 1,491mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,620mm103in | 2,626mm103in |
| Front track | 1,550mm61in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,518mm60in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 381L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,237L | 1,270L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Golf VIII Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Golf VII (5-DOOR) Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.9 s | 50.9 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 1,301 kg 2,868 lb |
| VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI and Volkswagen Golf VII (5-DOOR) Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Golf VII (5-DOOR) Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Golf VIII Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.4 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Golf VII (5-DOOR) Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenGolf VIIIFacelift 20241.5 eTSI | VolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20172.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,301 kg 2,868 lb | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,020 km 634 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Golf VIII Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI | Volkswagen Golf VII (5-DOOR) Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Golf VIII Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI
- Is 94 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 1 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen Golf VII (5-DOOR) Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI
- Has 90 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























