Volkswagen Golf IV
Car comparison
Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6vsVolkswagen Polo IV (9N) · Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Polo IV (9N) · Facelift 2005
GTI Cup 1.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8
- Lightest1,095 kg2,414 lb
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk270 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score69/100
Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 235Nm173lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,095kg2,414lb |
| Gross weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 76.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 79.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.3s Calculated | 29.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 570km354mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 1,781cc109cu in |
| Length | 4,149mm163in | 3,916mm154in |
| Width | 1,735mm68in | 1,650mm65in |
| Height | 1,439mm57in | 1,459mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,518mm99in | 2,466mm97in |
| Front track | 1,513mm60in | 1,434mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,487mm59in | 1,426mm56in |
| Trunk volume | 245L | 270L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,185L | 1,030L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 6,200 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 5,500 rpm | 1,950 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.3 s | 29.7 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6 has 24 hp more than Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8 and Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 235 Nm 173 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 1,095 kg 2,414 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 7.1 s |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6 and Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenGolf IV2.8 VR6 | VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 235 Nm 173 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,095 kg 2,414 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 570 km 354 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 245 L 8.7 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Golf IV 2.8 VR6
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























