Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant
Car comparison
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Golf III Variant
2.9 VR6 Syncro
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk611 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 245Nm181lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,380kg3,042lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 71.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.7s Calculated | 34.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 613km381mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,861cc175cu in |
| Length | 4,633mm182in | 4,340mm171in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | 1,695mm67in |
| Height | 1,498mm59in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,669mm105in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,478mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,465mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 611L | 466L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,642L | 1,425L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 5,800 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.7 s | 34.4 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 714 km 444 mi |
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 613 km 381 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.1 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 613 km 381 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 611 L 21.6 cu ft | 466 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI
- Has 75 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro
- Is 255 kg lighter
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























