Volkswagen Polo VI
Car comparison
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Beetle (A5) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Beetle (A5) · Facelift 2016
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk310 L
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,250kg2,756lb | 1,351kg2,978lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 80.8s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 29.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 635km395mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,067mm160in | 4,288mm169in |
| Width | 1,751mm69in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,549mm100in | 2,524mm99in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,581mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,496mm59in | 1,553mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 305L | 310L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,079L | 905L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 4,900-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,350 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 29.3 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 1,351 kg 2,978 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
Although Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI has more power, Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 635 km 395 mi |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | 1,351 kg 2,978 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 635 km 395 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 305 L 10.8 cu ft | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI
- Is 101 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 198 km (123 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























