Volvo C70 Coupe
Car comparison
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V TurbovsToyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Celica (T23)
1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Largest trunk403 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Lightest1,215 kg2,679 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 180Nm133lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,215kg2,679lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 95.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 84.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.7s Calculated | 30.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 148Nm/t99lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 655km407mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,335mm171in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,735mm68in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,490mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,480mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 403L | 365L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 5,700 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 7,800 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.7 s | 30.6 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 192 hp 143 kW |
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo has 33 hp more than Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo: 33 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 1,215 kg 2,679 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 7.5 s |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 7.4 s |
Although Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo has more power, Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,215 kg 2,679 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 655 km 407 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 403 L 14.2 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo
- Has 33 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























