Car comparison

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSIvsToyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Arteon

2.0 TSI

280 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2017-2018
VS

Toyota Celica (T20)

2.0 Turbo

242 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedLiftback / fastback1994-1999

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    280 hp
    209 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    904 km
    562 mi
  • Largest trunk
    563 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
Power
280hp209kW
242hp180kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
302Nm223lb-ft
Curb weight
1,641kg3,618lb
1,390kg3,064lb
Gross weight
2,240kg4,938lb
1,785kg3,935lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
96.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
91.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.6s
6.1s
0-200 km/h
22.7s
Calculated
25.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.3s
Calculated
5.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
14.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
171hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
904km562mi
Calculated
716km445mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,862mm191in
4,420mm174in
Width
1,871mm74in
1,750mm69in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,305mm51in
Wheelbase
2,837mm112in
2,450mm96in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,510mm59in
Rear track
1,581mm62in
1,490mm59in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
-
Trunk volume
563L
208L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
66L
68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSIToyota Celica (T20) 2.0 TurboPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI5,100-6,500 rpm1,700-5,600 rpm6,750 rpm
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.3 s
5.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.6 s
6.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.7 s
25.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.6 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
14.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
102 mph
160 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
242 hp
180 kW

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI has 38 hp more than Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: 38 hp (28 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
302 Nm
223 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
1,641 kg
3,618 lb
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
1,390 kg
3,064 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI5.6 s
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo6.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
171 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
904 km
562 mi
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
716 km
445 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
5.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
242 hp
180 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
Power
242 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
208 L
7.3 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
Power
242 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
5.6 s
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
6.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
171 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
Power
280 hp
209 kW
242 hp
180 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
302 Nm
223 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.6 s
6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,641 kg
3,618 lb
1,390 kg
3,064 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
208 L
7.3 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
Range score
904 km
562 mi
716 km
445 mi
Trunk score
563 L
19.9 cu ft
208 L
7.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
171 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSIToyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km16.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi26.76 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year2,494 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

  • Has 38 hp more
  • Has 48 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 188 km (117 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 355 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo

  • Is 251 kg lighter
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 Turbo
1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
VS
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 TurbovsToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 Turbo
45 TFSI
VS
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 TurbovsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201945 TFSI
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)3.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
50 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)50 TDI
2.0 Turbo
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 TurbovsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 Turbo
2.0 BiTDI
VS
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 TurbovsVolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
60 60 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsTeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh
2.0 Turbo
45 TDI V6
VS
ToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 TurbovsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
2.0 TSI
70 70 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsTeslaModel S70 70 kWh
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI vs Toyota Celica (T20) 2.0 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster