Volvo S60
Car comparison
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20VvsToyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Camry VI (XV40)
3.5i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight171 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score60/100
Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Most powerful277 hp207 kW
- Largest trunk535 L
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 277hp207kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 346Nm255lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | 2,025kg4,464lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 63.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.2s Calculated | 22.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 707km439mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,401cc147cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,576mm180in | 4,815mm190in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,428mm56in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 424L | 535L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,034L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 233g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: Power / Torque
- Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 5,500 rpm | 2,100 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.2 s | 22.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW |
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 277 hp 207 kW |
Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6 has 17 hp more than Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V and Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 6.9 s |
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6 and Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 277 hp 207 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 277 hp 207 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 707 km 439 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 233 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
- Has 4 Nm more
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6
- Has 17 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 111 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























