Techrules Ren
Car comparison
Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh · Stage 2vsTechrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh · Stage 3vsTechrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh · Stage 1vsTechrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTechrules Ren
RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)
Techrules Ren
RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)
Techrules Ren
RS 28.4 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2) 1743 hp · d894
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.6 s
- Fastest top speed373 km/h232 mph
- Most powerful1,743 hp1,300 kW
- Highest torque2,500 Nm1,844 lb-ft
- Lightest1,854 kg4,087 lb
- Best power-to-weight940 hp/t701 kW/t1.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,067 km663 mi
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,743hp1,300kW+438 hp | 1,743hp1,300kW+438 hp | 1,566hp1,168kW+261 hp | 1,305hp973kW |
| Torque | 2,500Nm1,844lb-ft+160 Nm | 2,500Nm1,844lb-ft+160 Nm | 2,500Nm1,844lb-ft+160 Nm | 2,340Nm1,726lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,854kg4,087lb | 1,854kg4,087lb | 1,854kg4,087lb | 1,854kg4,087lb |
| Top speed | 373 km/h 232 mph | 373 km/h 232 mph | 362 km/h 225 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 40.9s99% target: 369 km/h / 229 mph+0.7 s Calculated | 40.9s99% target: 369 km/h / 229 mph+0.7 s Calculated | 41.2s99% target: 358 km/h / 223 mph+1.0 s Calculated | 40.2s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.6s-0.4 s | 2.6s-0.4 s | 2.8s-0.3 s | 3.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 6.6s-1.3 s Calculated | 6.6s-1.3 s Calculated | 7.0s-0.9 s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.5s-0.4 s Calculated | 2.5s-0.4 s Calculated | 2.6s-0.2 s Calculated | 2.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 9.7s-0.7 s Calculated | 9.7s-0.7 s Calculated | 9.9s-0.5 s Calculated | 10.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 940hp/t701kW/t427hp/1000 lb Calculated | 940hp/t701kW/t427hp/1000 lb Calculated | 845hp/t630kW/t383hp/1000 lb Calculated | 704hp/t525kW/t319hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 1,348Nm/t902lb-ft/ton Calculated | 1,348Nm/t902lb-ft/ton Calculated | 1,348Nm/t902lb-ft/ton Calculated | 1,262Nm/t845lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,067km663mi Calculated | 1,067km663mi Calculated | 1,067km663mi Calculated | 1,067km663mi Calculated |
| Length | 5,072mm200in | 5,072mm200in | 5,072mm200in | 5,072mm200in |
| Width | 2,055mm81in | 2,055mm81in | 2,055mm81in | 2,055mm81in |
| Height | 1,260mm50in | 1,260mm50in | 1,260mm50in | 1,260mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,724mm107in | 2,724mm107in | 2,724mm107in | 2,724mm107in |
| Front track | 1,786mm70in | 1,786mm70in | 1,786mm70in | 1,786mm70in |
| Rear track | 1,775mm70in | 1,775mm70in | 1,775mm70in | 1,775mm70in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 120mm5in | 120mm5in | 120mm5in |
| Doors | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Seats | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 80L | 80L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s | 2.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.6 s | 2.6 s | 2.8 s | 3.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 6.6 s | 6.6 s | 7.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 17.3 s | 17.3 s | 19.4 s | 32.2 s |
| Top speed | 373 km/h 232 mph | 373 km/h 232 mph | 362 km/h 225 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.8 s | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.4 s | 4.4 s | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.2 s | 8.2 s | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s | 9.9 s | 10.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 251 km/h 156 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | 245 km/h 153 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | 1,743 hp 1,300 kW |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | 1,743 hp 1,300 kW |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | 1,566 hp 1,168 kW |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp | 1,305 hp 973 kW |
Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2) 1743 hp · d894 has 438 hp more than Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh 1305 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh 1305 hp and Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3) 1743 hp · e4b3: 438 hp (327 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | 2,500 Nm 1,844 lb-ft |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | 2,500 Nm 1,844 lb-ft |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | 2,500 Nm 1,844 lb-ft |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp | 2,340 Nm 1,726 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | 1,854 kg 4,087 lb |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | 1,854 kg 4,087 lb |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | 1,854 kg 4,087 lb |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp | 1,854 kg 4,087 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | 373 km/h 232 mph |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | 373 km/h 232 mph |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | 362 km/h 225 mph |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | 2.6 s |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | 2.6 s |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | 2.8 s |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp | 3.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2) 1743 hp · d894 and Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh 1305 hp: 0.4 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3) 1743 hp · e4b3 and Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1) 1566 hp, separated by only 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | 940 hp/t 701 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | 940 hp/t 701 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | 845 hp/t 630 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp | 704 hp/t 525 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | 1,067 km 663 mi |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | 1,067 km 663 mi |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | 1,067 km 663 mi |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp | 1,067 km 663 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | 1,743 hp 1,300 kW | 2.6 s | 373 km/h 232 mph |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | 1,743 hp 1,300 kW | 2.6 s | 373 km/h 232 mph |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | 1,566 hp 1,168 kW | 2.8 s | 362 km/h 225 mph |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp | 1,305 hp 973 kW | 3.0 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2) 1743 hp · d894 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 2.6 s |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 2.6 s |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | 940 hp/t 701 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | 940 hp/t 701 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | 845 hp/t 630 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp | 704 hp/t 525 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2)1743 hp · d894 | TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3)1743 hp · e4b3 | TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1)1566 hp | TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh1305 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,743 hp 1,300 kW | 1,743 hp 1,300 kW | 1,566 hp 1,168 kW | 1,305 hp 973 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 2,500 Nm 1,844 lb-ft | 2,500 Nm 1,844 lb-ft | 2,500 Nm 1,844 lb-ft | 2,340 Nm 1,726 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.6 s | 2.6 s | 2.8 s | 3.0 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 373 km/h 232 mph | 373 km/h 232 mph | 362 km/h 225 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,854 kg 4,087 lb | 1,854 kg 4,087 lb | 1,854 kg 4,087 lb | 1,854 kg 4,087 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,067 km 663 mi | 1,067 km 663 mi | 1,067 km 663 mi | 1,067 km 663 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 940 hp/t 701 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp | 940 hp/t 701 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp | 845 hp/t 630 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 704 hp/t 525 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2) 1743 hp · d894 | Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3) 1743 hp · e4b3 | Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 1) 1566 hp | Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh 1305 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 2) 1743 hp · d894
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh (Stage 3) 1743 hp · e4b3
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























