Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 iV 1.4 TSivsVolkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon
1.5 TSI ACT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 iV 1.4 TSi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful156 hp116 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions35 g/km
- Best estimated range3,333 km2,071 mi
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score100/100
Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT
- Lightest1,556 kg3,430 lb
- Best power-to-weight96 hp/t72 kW/t10.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk563 L
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,556kg3,430lb |
| Gross weight | 2,251kg4,963lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 121.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 134.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.0s Calculated | 56.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 1.5L/100 km156.8mpg US188.3mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 96hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 151Nm/t101lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 3,333km2,071mi Calculated | 1,100km684mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,395cc85cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,869mm192in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,839mm112in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,581mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 137mm5in | 138mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 563L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,610L | 1,557L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 35g/km | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 iV 1.4 TSi: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,550-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.0 s | 56.2 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 135 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | 156 hp 116 kW |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW |
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 iV 1.4 TSi has 6 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT and Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 iV 1.4 TSi: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 1,556 kg 3,430 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 iV 1.4 TSi and Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 iV 1.4 TSi and Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT: 4.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | 3,333 km 2,071 mi |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 1,100 km 684 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | 156 hp 116 kW | 7.7 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi |
| 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 iV 1.4 TSi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 2019iV 1.4 TSi | VolkswagenArteon1.5 TSI ACT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,556 kg 3,430 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 3,333 km 2,071 mi | 1,100 km 684 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 35 g/km | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 iV 1.4 TSi | Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 2.63 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 4.22 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 225 L59 US gal49 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 393.75 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 iV 1.4 TSi
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2,233 km (1,388 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 101 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI ACT
- Is 99 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 78 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























