Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,656 kg3,651 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range930 km578 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,761kg3,882lb | 1,656kg3,651lb |
| Gross weight | 2,268kg5,000lb | 2,270kg5,004lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 96.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 93.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.8s Calculated | 22.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 917km570mi Calculated | 930km578mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,869mm192in | 4,866mm192in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 138mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 625L | 563L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,760L | 1,557L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,900 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5,100-6,500 rpm | 2,000-4,900 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.8 s | 22.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 1,761 kg 3,882 lb |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,656 kg 3,651 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 5.2 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 917 km 570 mi |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 930 km 578 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,761 kg 3,882 lb | 1,656 kg 3,651 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 917 km 570 mi | 930 km 578 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 13 km (8 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























