Car comparison

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Superb III 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2020-2023
VS

Skoda Superb III

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI

  • Lightest
    1,480 kg
    3,263 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.8 L/100 km
    61.9 mpg US
    74.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,535 km
    954 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    1,557 L
  • Best performance score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDISkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
Power
200hp149kW
190hp142kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,573kg3,468lb
1,480kg3,263lb
Gross weight
2,220kg4,894lb
2,130kg4,696lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
125.5s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
133.2s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
38.6s
Calculated
40.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,404km873mi
Calculated
1,535km954mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,866mm192in
4,861mm191in
Width
1,871mm74in
1,864mm73in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,468mm58in
Wheelbase
2,835mm112in
2,841mm112in
Front track-
1,584mm62in
Rear track-
1,572mm62in
Ground clearance-
149mm6in
Trunk volume-
625L
Max trunk volume
1,557L
1,760L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L
CO2 emissions
125g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDISkoda Superb III 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI-1,750-3,500 rpm3,750 rpm
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDISkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.6 s
40.1 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
1,573 kg
3,468 lb
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
1,480 kg
3,263 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
237 km/h
147 mph
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI7.9 s
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI8.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
1,404 km
873 mi
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
1,535 km
954 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.9 s
237 km/h
147 mph
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
8.0 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,557 L
55.0 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,861 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
7.9 s
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDISkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,573 kg
3,468 lb
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
Fuel consumption
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,557 L
55.0 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,861 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Range score
1,404 km
873 mi
1,535 km
954 mi
CO2 score
125 g/km
-
Trunk score
1,557 L
55.0 cu ft
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDISkoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
Consumption4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.23 LC100 km7.52 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.24 LC100 mi12.11 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used705 L186 US gal155 UK gal645 L170 US gal142 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,234 LC/year1,129 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 932 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI

  • Is 93 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 131 km (81 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI
2.0 TDI
3.0 TDI V6 ultra
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 ultra
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201940 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsAUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI
EQS 350 100 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2.0 TDI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TDI
60 60 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDIvsTeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh
Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI vs Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster