Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb III · Facelift 2019
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,573 kg3,468 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions125 g/km
- Best estimated range1,404 km873 mi
- Largest trunk1,557 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,573kg3,468lb | 1,590kg3,505lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 125.5s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 128.6s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.6s Calculated | 42.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,404km873mi Calculated | 1,347km837mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,866mm192in | 4,869mm192in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,841mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 625L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,557L | 1,760L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 125g/km | 187g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.6 s | 42.2 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,573 kg 3,468 lb |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,404 km 873 mi |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,347 km 837 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,573 kg 3,468 lb | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,404 km 873 mi | 1,347 km 837 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 125 g/km | 187 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,557 L 55.0 cu ft | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI | Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 17 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 57 km (36 mi) more estimated range
- Has 932 L more trunk volume
- Emits 62 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























