Car comparison

Skoda Superb II Combi · Facelift 2013 3.6 FSIvsVolvo V70 III 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb II Combi · Facelift 2013

3.6 FSI

260 hp3597 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2013-2015
VS

Volvo V70 III

2.0 T5

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    633 L
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5

  • Lightest
    1,567 kg
    3,455 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    153 hp/t
    114 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    189 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    864 km
    537 mi
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSIVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
Power
260hp194kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,726kg3,805lb
1,567kg3,455lb
Gross weight
2,287kg5,042lb
2,180kg4,806lb
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
To 99% top speed
69.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
79.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
28.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton
Calculated
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
638km397mi
Calculated
864km537mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,597cc220cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,833mm190in
4,823mm190in
Width
1,817mm72in
1,907mm75in
Height
1,511mm59in
1,547mm61in
Wheelbase
2,761mm109in
2,816mm111in
Front track
1,537mm61in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,510mm59in
1,586mm62in
Ground clearance-
151mm6in
Trunk volume
633L
575L
Max trunk volume
1,865L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
70L
CO2 emissions
217g/km
189g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSIVolvo V70 III 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI-2,400-4,000 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoV70 III2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,980 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSIVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
28.4 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
102 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
260 hp
194 kW
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
240 hp
179 kW

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI has 20 hp more than Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 and Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
1,726 kg
3,805 lb
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
1,567 kg
3,455 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
250 km/h
155 mph
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
240 km/h
149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI6.5 s
VolvoV70 III2.0 T57.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 and Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
638 km
397 mi
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
864 km
537 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
260 hp
194 kW
6.5 s
250 km/h
155 mph
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
240 hp
179 kW
7.7 s
240 km/h
149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,823 mm
189.9 in
Height
1,547 mm
60.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
6.5 s
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSIVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
Power
260 hp
194 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.7 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
Lightness
1,726 kg
3,805 lb
1,567 kg
3,455 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,823 mm
189.9 in
Height
1,547 mm
60.9 in
Range score
638 km
397 mi
864 km
537 mi
CO2 score
217 g/km
189 g/km
Trunk score
633 L
22.4 cu ft
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSIVolvo V70 III 2.0 T5
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 58 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5

  • Is 159 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 226 km (140 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 28 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.6 FSI
330d
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSIvsBMW3 Series Touring (F31)330d
2.0 T5
2.4i 20V T5
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
3.6 FSI
CLS 350 BlueTEC V6
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSIvsMercedes-BenzCLS Shooting Brake (X218)Facelift 2014CLS 350 BlueTEC V6
2.0 T5
R 2.5i V20
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20
3.6 FSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
2.0 T5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
3.6 FSI
Cupra 2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSIvsSeatLeon III STCupra 2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
3.6 FSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoV902.0 T5
3.6 FSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
2.0 T5
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
Skoda Superb II Combi · Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI vs Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster