Car comparison

Skoda Superb II Combi · Facelift 2013 3.6 FSIvsVolkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb II Combi · Facelift 2013

3.6 FSI

260 hp3597 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2013-2015
VS

Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8)

2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,701 kg
    3,750 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    145 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,200 km
    746 mi
  • Largest trunk
    639 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSIVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
Power
260hp194kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,726kg3,805lb
1,701kg3,750lb
Gross weight
2,287kg5,042lb
2,360kg5,203lb
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
69.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
59.1s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
23.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton
Calculated
294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
638km397mi
Calculated
1,200km746mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,597cc220cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,833mm190in
4,777mm188in
Width
1,817mm72in
1,832mm72in
Height
1,511mm59in
1,506mm59in
Wheelbase
2,761mm109in
2,789mm110in
Front track
1,537mm61in
1,582mm62in
Rear track
1,510mm59in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance-
174mm7in
Trunk volume
633L
639L
Max trunk volume
1,865L
1,769L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
66L
CO2 emissions
217g/km
145g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSIVolkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI-2,400-4,000 rpm4,250 rpm
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSIVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
23.6 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
102 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDI and Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
1,726 kg
3,805 lb
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
1,701 kg
3,750 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
250 km/h
155 mph
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI has more power, Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDI and Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDI and Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI: 3.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
638 km
397 mi
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
1,200 km
746 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
260 hp
194 kW
6.5 s
250 km/h
155 mph
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
6.4 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
639 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,777 mm
188.1 in
Height
1,506 mm
59.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
6.5 s
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSI
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb II CombiFacelift 20133.6 FSIVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
Power
260 hp
194 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.4 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,726 kg
3,805 lb
1,701 kg
3,750 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
639 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,777 mm
188.1 in
Height
1,506 mm
59.3 in
Range score
638 km
397 mi
1,200 km
746 mi
CO2 score
217 g/km
145 g/km
Trunk score
633 L
22.4 cu ft
639 L
22.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSIVolkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDI
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km9.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi15.49 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal825 L218 US gal181 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year1,444 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb II Combi Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 25 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 562 km (349 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 72 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI
Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Superb II Combi · Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI vs Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 BiTDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster