Car comparison

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Superb II · Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Arteon

2.0 TSI

280 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2017-2018
VS

Skoda Superb II · Facelift 2013

3.6 FSI

260 hp3597 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedLiftback / fastback2013-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    280 hp
    209 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,641 kg
    3,618 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    171 hp/t
    127 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    904 km
    562 mi
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSISkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
Power
280hp209kW
260hp194kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,641kg3,618lb
1,704kg3,757lb
Gross weight
2,240kg4,938lb
2,265kg4,993lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
96.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
117.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.6s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
22.7s
Calculated
26.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.3s
Calculated
6.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
14.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
171hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
904km562mi
Calculated
645km401mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
3,597cc220cu in
Length
4,862mm191in
4,833mm190in
Width
1,871mm74in
1,817mm72in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,462mm58in
Wheelbase
2,837mm112in
2,761mm109in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,537mm61in
Rear track
1,581mm62in
1,510mm59in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
-
Trunk volume
563L
595L
Max trunk volume-
1,700L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
60L
CO2 emissions-
215g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSISkoda Superb II Facelift 2013 3.6 FSIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI5,100-6,500 rpm1,700-5,600 rpm6,750 rpm
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI-2,400-4,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSISkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.3 s
6.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.6 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.7 s
26.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.6 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
14.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
102 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
260 hp
194 kW

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI has 20 hp more than Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
1,641 kg
3,618 lb
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
1,704 kg
3,757 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI5.6 s
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI6.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
171 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
904 km
562 mi
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
645 km
401 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
5.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
260 hp
194 kW
6.4 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
595 L
21.0 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
5.6 s
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
6.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
171 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSISkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.6 s
6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,641 kg
3,618 lb
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
595 L
21.0 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Range score
904 km
562 mi
645 km
401 mi
CO2 score
-
215 g/km
Trunk score
563 L
19.9 cu ft
595 L
21.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
171 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSISkoda Superb II Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km16.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi26.19 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year2,441 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 63 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 259 km (161 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
3.6 FSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
3.6 FSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)3.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
50 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)50 TDI
3.6 FSI
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
50 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201950 TDI V6
2.0 TSI
60 60 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsTeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh
3.6 FSI
70 70 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSIvsTeslaModel S70 70 kWh
3.6 FSI
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20133.6 FSIvsAUDIS5 Sportback (8T)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6
2.0 TSI
50 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202350 TDI V6
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI vs Skoda Superb II · Facelift 2013 3.6 FSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster