Car comparison

Skoda Superb II · Facelift 2013 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb II · Facelift 2013

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2013-2015
VS

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    125 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,404 km
    873 mi
  • Largest trunk
    1,557 L
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Lightest
    1,540 kg
    3,395 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    130 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200hp149kW
200hp149kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,573kg3,468lb
Gross weight
2,103kg4,636lb
2,220kg4,894lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
127.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
125.5s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
37.1s
Calculated
38.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
759km472mi
Calculated
1,404km873mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,833mm190in
4,866mm192in
Width
1,817mm72in
1,871mm74in
Height
1,462mm58in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,761mm109in
2,835mm112in
Front track
1,545mm61in
-
Rear track
1,518mm60in
-
Trunk volume
595L
-
Max trunk volume
1,700L
1,557L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
66L
CO2 emissions
178g/km
125g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI-1,700-5,000 rpm5,250 rpm
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI-1,750-3,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.1 s
38.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
1,573 kg
3,468 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
240 km/h
149 mph
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI7.7 s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI7.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: 3.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
759 km
472 mi
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
1,404 km
873 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.7 s
240 km/h
149 mph
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.9 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
595 L
21.0 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,557 L
55.0 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.7 s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,573 kg
3,468 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
595 L
21.0 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,557 L
55.0 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
759 km
472 mi
1,404 km
873 mi
CO2 score
178 g/km
125 g/km
Trunk score
595 L
21.0 cu ft
1,557 L
55.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km8.23 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi13.24 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal705 L186 US gal155 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year1,234 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI

  • Is 33 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 645 km (401 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 962 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 53 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201940 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsAUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI
EQS 350 100 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2.0 TSI
70 70 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsTeslaModel S70 70 kWh
Skoda Superb II · Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster