Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Octavia IV vRS 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia IV
vRS 2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Best power-to-weight171 hp/t127 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk563 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Skoda Octavia IV vRS 2.0 TSI
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,508 kg3,325 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,641kg3,618lb | 1,508kg3,325lb |
| Gross weight | 2,240kg4,938lb | 2,025kg4,464lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 96.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 110.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.7s Calculated | 26.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 904km562mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,690mm185in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 2,686mm106in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,535mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,405L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia IV vRS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 5,100-6,500 rpm | 1,700-5,600 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.7 s | 26.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 102 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI has 35 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV vRS 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV vRS 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 1,641 kg 3,618 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI | 1,508 kg 3,325 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 5.6 s |
| SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia IV vRS 2.0 TSI: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | SkodaOctavia IVvRS 2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,641 kg 3,618 lb | 1,508 kg 3,325 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 904 km 562 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI | Skoda Octavia IV vRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Has 35 hp more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 113 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Skoda Octavia IV vRS 2.0 TSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 133 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























