Skoda Octavia IV Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 1.5 TSI EVOvsVolkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Golf VIII Variant
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,445 kg3,186 lb
- Best power-to-weight104 hp/t77 kW/t9.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score96/100
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 1.5 TSI EVO
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Largest trunk640 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,445kg3,186lb |
| Gross weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 81.5s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.1s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 918km571mi Calculated | 1,250km777mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,633mm182in |
| Width | 1,829mm72in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,498mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,686mm106in | 2,669mm105in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,535mm60in | 1,519mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 640L | 611L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | 1,624L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia IV Combi 1.5 TSI EVO: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI | 3,500 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.1 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi 1.5 TSI EVO and Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia IV Combi 1.5 TSI EVO: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | 918 km 571 mi |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI | 1,250 km 777 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI |
| 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IV Combi1.5 TSI EVO | VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 918 km 571 mi | 1,250 km 777 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | 611 L 21.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia IV Combi 1.5 TSI EVO | Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 7.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 11.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 600 L159 US gal132 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,050 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 1.5 TSI EVO
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TDI
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 332 km (206 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























