Volvo V90
Car comparison
Volvo V90 2.0 D4vsSkoda Octavia III Scout · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III Scout · Facelift 2017
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,170 km727 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,626 kg3,585 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV902.0 D4 | SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,882kg4,149lb | 1,626kg3,585lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,136kg4,709lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 70.5s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 36.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,170km727mi Calculated | 786km488mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,936mm194in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,531mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,539mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | 171mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,526L | 1,740L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 124g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV902.0 D4 | SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 36.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 8.5 s |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI and Volvo V90 2.0 D4: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D4 and Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,170 km 727 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 786 km 488 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V90 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV902.0 D4 | SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,170 km 727 mi | 786 km 488 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 124 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V90 2.0 D4 | Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 384 km (239 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Is 256 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























