Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSIvsVolvo V90 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,518 kg3,347 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T5
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,518kg3,347lb | 1,871kg4,125lb |
| Gross weight | 1,978kg4,361lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 73.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.0s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 794km493mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,200 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.0 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 T5 has 5 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI and Volvo V90 2.0 T5: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 1,518 kg 3,347 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 1,871 kg 4,125 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 7.0 s |
Although Volvo V90 2.0 T5 has more power, Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI and Volvo V90 2.0 T5: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI and Volvo V90 2.0 T5: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 794 km 493 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T5 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | VolvoV902.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,518 kg 3,347 lb | 1,871 kg 4,125 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 794 km 493 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI | Volvo V90 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 353 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo V90 2.0 T5
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 89 km (55 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























