Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Polo VI
GTI 2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted232 km/h144 mph Restricted
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range769 km478 mi
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,528kg3,369lb | 1,280kg2,822lb |
| Gross weight | 1,983kg4,372lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph Calculated | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 75.7s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 26.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 645km401mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,067mm160in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,751mm69in |
| Height | 1,459mm57in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,549mm100in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,496mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 305L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | 1,079L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 4,900-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,350 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 26.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph Likely limited | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 1,528 kg 3,369 lb |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
Although Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI has more power, Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 769 km 478 mi |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 645 km 401 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.7 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,528 kg 3,369 lb | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 645 km 401 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 305 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 124 km (77 mi) more estimated range
- Has 285 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 248 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























