Car comparison

Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIvsVolvo V70 III 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009

RS 2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2009-2013
VS

Volvo V70 III

2.0 T5

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    239 km/h
    149 mph
  • Lightest
    1,465 kg
    3,230 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    137 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    605 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5

  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    833 km
    518 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
Power
200hp149kW
240hp179kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,465kg3,230lb
1,806kg3,982lb
Gross weight
1,945kg4,288lb
2,410kg5,313lb
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
72.1s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
80.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
26.6s
Calculated
30.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
733km456mi
Calculated
833km518mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,599mm181in
4,823mm190in
Width
1,769mm70in
-
Height
1,451mm57in
1,547mm61in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,816mm111in
Front track
1,528mm60in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,508mm59in
1,586mm62in
Ground clearance
128mm5in
151mm6in
Trunk volume
605L
575L
Max trunk volume
1,655L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
70L
CO2 emissions-
195g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIVolvo V70 III 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI5,100-6,000 rpm1,700-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoV70 III2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,980 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.6 s
30.5 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
240 hp
179 kW

Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 has 40 hp more than Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
1,806 kg
3,982 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
239 km/h
149 mph
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI7.3 s
VolvoV70 III2.0 T57.9 s

Although Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 has more power, Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
733 km
456 mi
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
833 km
518 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.3 s
239 km/h
149 mph
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,451 mm
57.1 in
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,823 mm
189.9 in
Height
1,547 mm
60.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.3 s
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
Power
200 hp
149 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.9 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
1,806 kg
3,982 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,451 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,823 mm
189.9 in
Height
1,547 mm
60.9 in
Range score
733 km
456 mi
833 km
518 mi
CO2 score
-
195 g/km
Trunk score
605 L
21.4 cu ft
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIVolvo V70 III 2.0 T5
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI

  • Is 341 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 30 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 T5
2.4i 20V T5
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
R 2.5i V20
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20
RS 2.0 TSI
2.4 i-VTEC
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
2.0 T5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
RS 2.0 TSI
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsRenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 T5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
RS 2.0 TSI
Cooper S 1.6
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoV902.0 T5
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI vs Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster