Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq II
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Lightest1,456 kg3,210 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score90/100
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range879 km546 mi
- Largest trunk845 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,456kg3,210lb | 1,974kg4,352lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | - |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.9s Calculated | 43.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 873km542mi Calculated | 879km546mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,236mm167in | 4,758mm187in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,582mm62in | 1,656mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,594mm102in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 158mm6in | 187mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 392L | 845L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,237L | 2,035L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.9 s | 43.7 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW |
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI has 3 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 1,974 kg 4,352 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
Although Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 873 km 542 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 879 km 546 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.8 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW | 8.0 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb | 1,974 kg 4,352 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 873 km 542 mi | 879 km 546 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | 845 L 29.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI | Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Is 518 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 6 km (4 mi) more estimated range
- Has 453 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























