Skoda Kodiaq I
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI · Stage 3vsSkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI · Stage 2vsSkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI · Stage 1vsSkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I
RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)
Skoda Kodiaq I
RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)
Skoda Kodiaq I
RS 2.0 BiTDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3) 372 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed261 km/h162 mph
- Most powerful372 hp277 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lightest1,923 kg4,239 lb
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions167 g/km
- Best estimated range938 km583 mi
- Largest trunk725 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 372hp277kW+132 hp | 324hp242kW+84 hp | 288hp215kW+48 hp | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft+300 Nm | 700Nm516lb-ft+200 Nm | 625Nm461lb-ft+125 Nm | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,923kg4,239lb | 1,923kg4,239lb | 1,923kg4,239lb | 1,923kg4,239lb |
| Gross weight | 2,421kg5,337lb | 2,421kg5,337lb | 2,421kg5,337lb | 2,421kg5,337lb |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.1s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph-12.1 s Calculated | 73.1s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph-7.1 s Calculated | 76.8s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph-3.4 s Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s-1.7 s | 5.7s-1.2 s | 6.2s-0.8 s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s-17.4 s Calculated | 21.8s-13.9 s Calculated | 25.6s-10.1 s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s-1.5 s Calculated | 5.4s-1.1 s Calculated | 5.8s-0.7 s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s-1.6 s Calculated | 13.9s-1.1 s Calculated | 14.3s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 416Nm/t278lb-ft/ton Calculated | 364Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 938km583mi Calculated | 938km583mi Calculated | 938km583mi Calculated | 938km583mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,699mm185in | 4,699mm185in | 4,699mm185in | 4,699mm185in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,882mm74in | 1,882mm74in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,686mm66in | 1,686mm66in | 1,686mm66in | 1,686mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,789mm110in | 2,789mm110in | 2,789mm110in | 2,789mm110in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,579mm62in | 1,579mm62in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,567mm62in | 1,567mm62in | 1,567mm62in | 1,567mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 197mm8in | 197mm8in | 197mm8in | 197mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 725L | 725L | 725L | 725L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,960L | 1,960L | 1,960L | 1,960L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 167g/km | 167g/km | 167g/km | 167g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3) 372 hp: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2) 324 hp: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1) 288 hp: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI 240 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.4 s | 5.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 21.8 s | 25.6 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.0 s | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.1 s | 9.3 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.7 s | 12.0 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.9 s | 14.3 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | 372 hp 277 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | 324 hp 242 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | 288 hp 215 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW |
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3) 372 hp has 132 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI 240 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI 240 hp and Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3) 372 hp: 132 hp (98 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | 1,923 kg 4,239 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | 1,923 kg 4,239 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | 1,923 kg 4,239 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp | 1,923 kg 4,239 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | 5.2 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | 5.7 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | 6.2 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3) 372 hp and Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI 240 hp: 1.7 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2) 324 hp and Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1) 288 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | 938 km 583 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | 938 km 583 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | 938 km 583 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp | 938 km 583 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | 372 hp 277 kW | 5.2 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | 324 hp 242 kW | 5.7 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | 288 hp 215 kW | 6.2 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.9 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3) 372 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3)372 hp | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2)324 hp | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1)288 hp | SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI240 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 372 hp 277 kW | 324 hp 242 kW | 288 hp 215 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,923 kg 4,239 lb | 1,923 kg 4,239 lb | 1,923 kg 4,239 lb | 1,923 kg 4,239 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 938 km 583 mi | 938 km 583 mi | 938 km 583 mi | 938 km 583 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 167 g/km | 167 g/km | 167 g/km | 167 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 725 L 25.6 cu ft | 725 L 25.6 cu ft | 725 L 25.6 cu ft | 725 L 25.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3) 372 hp | Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2) 324 hp | Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 1) 288 hp | Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI 240 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 3) 372 hp
- Has 48 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI (Stage 2) 324 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























