Skoda Karoq
Car comparison
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI · Stage 3vsSkoda Karoq 2.0 TDI · Stage 2vsSkoda Karoq 2.0 TDI · Stage 1vsSkoda Karoq 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Karoq
2.0 TDI (Stage 2)
Skoda Karoq
2.0 TDI (Stage 1)
Skoda Karoq
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 295 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful295 hp220 kW
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight183 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range1,038 km645 mi
- Largest trunk521 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295hp220kW+105 hp | 257hp191kW+67 hp | 228hp170kW+38 hp | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft+240 Nm | 560Nm413lb-ft+160 Nm | 500Nm369lb-ft+100 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.7s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph-13.1 s Calculated | 66.9s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph-8.9 s Calculated | 70.0s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph-5.8 s Calculated | 75.8s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s-1.8 s | 6.1s-1.3 s | 6.6s-0.8 s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.3s-23.6 s Calculated | 26.0s-18.9 s Calculated | 31.6s-13.3 s Calculated | 44.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s-1.6 s Calculated | 5.8s-1.2 s Calculated | 6.3s-0.7 s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s-1.6 s Calculated | 14.3s-1.1 s Calculated | 14.7s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 398Nm/t266lb-ft/ton Calculated | 348Nm/t233lb-ft/ton Calculated | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,038km645mi Calculated | 1,038km645mi Calculated | 1,038km645mi Calculated | 1,038km645mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,382mm173in | 4,382mm173in | 4,382mm173in | 4,382mm173in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,841mm72in | 1,841mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,607mm63in | 1,607mm63in | 1,607mm63in | 1,607mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,630mm104in | 2,630mm104in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,576mm62in | 1,576mm62in | 1,576mm62in | 1,576mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,547mm61in | 1,547mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 176mm7in | 176mm7in | 176mm7in | 176mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 521L | 521L | 521L | 521L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,630L | 1,630L | 1,630L | 1,630L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 139g/km | 139g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 295 hp: Power / Torque
- Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 2) 257 hp: Power / Torque
- Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 1) 228 hp: Power / Torque
- Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI 190 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.8 s | 6.3 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 6.1 s | 6.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.3 s | 26.0 s | 31.6 s | 44.9 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.2 s | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.3 s | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.0 s | 12.4 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.3 s | 14.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | 257 hp 191 kW |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | 228 hp 170 kW |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW |
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 295 hp has 105 hp more than Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI 190 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI 190 hp and Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 295 hp: 105 hp (78 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp | 211 km/h 131 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | 5.6 s |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | 6.1 s |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | 6.6 s |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 295 hp and Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI 190 hp: 1.8 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 2) 257 hp and Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 1) 228 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | 1,038 km 645 mi |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | 1,038 km 645 mi |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | 1,038 km 645 mi |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp | 1,038 km 645 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW | 5.6 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | 257 hp 191 kW | 6.1 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | 228 hp 170 kW | 6.6 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 295 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 3)295 hp | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 2)257 hp | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI (Stage 1)228 hp | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI190 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295 hp 220 kW | 257 hp 191 kW | 228 hp 170 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 6.1 s | 6.6 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,038 km 645 mi | 1,038 km 645 mi | 1,038 km 645 mi | 1,038 km 645 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 139 g/km | 139 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 295 hp | Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 2) 257 hp | Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 1) 228 hp | Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI 190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 295 hp
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI (Stage 2) 257 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























