Tesla Model Y
Car comparison
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWhvsSeres 5 80 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeres 5
80 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,995 kg4,398 lb
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk854 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Seres 5 80 kWh
- Most powerful585 hp436 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | Seres580 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 534hp398kW | 585hp436kW |
| Torque | - | 940Nm693lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 35.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 33.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s Calculated | 21.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 268hp/t200kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated | 248hp/t185kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 398Nm/t267lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,710mm185in |
| Width | 1,921mm76in | 1,930mm76in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,620mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,890mm114in | 2,875mm113in |
| Front track | 1,646mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 167mm7in | 180mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 854L | 367L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,158L | 723L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | Seres580 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 21.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 126 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 534 hp 398 kW |
| Seres580 kWh | 585 hp 436 kW |
Seres 5 80 kWh has 51 hp more than Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh and Seres 5 80 kWh: 51 hp (38 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
| Seres580 kWh | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Seres580 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 3.7 s |
| Seres580 kWh | 4.0 s |
Although Seres 5 80 kWh has more power, Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh and Seres 5 80 kWh: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Seres580 kWh | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 534 hp 398 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Seres580 kWh | 585 hp 436 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Seres580 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | Seres580 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 534 hp 398 kW | 585 hp 436 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 940 Nm 693 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 854 L 30.2 cu ft | 367 L 13.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
- Is 365 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 487 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Seres 5 80 kWh
- Has 51 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























