Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIvsSeat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon X-Perience
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,412 kg3,113 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,122 km697 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,412kg3,113lb | 1,529kg3,371lb |
| Gross weight | 1,978kg4,361lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.7s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.1s Calculated | 30.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,020km634mi Calculated | 1,122km697mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,543mm179in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,503mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.1 s | 30.2 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 1,529 kg 3,371 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,020 km 634 mi |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 1,122 km 697 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.0 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.1 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb | 1,529 kg 3,371 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,020 km 634 mi | 1,122 km 697 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI | Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Is 117 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 102 km (63 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























