Skoda Octavia III Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSIvsSeat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon X-Perience
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
- Best estimated range1,122 km697 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,529kg3,371lb |
| Gross weight | 2,013kg4,438lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.5s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.3s Calculated | 30.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 821km510mi Calculated | 1,122km697mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,659mm183in | 4,543mm179in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,503mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 156g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.3 s | 30.2 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI has 4 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI and Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 1,529 kg 3,371 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 7.5 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 821 km 510 mi |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 1,122 km 697 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.5 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.1 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,529 kg 3,371 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 821 km 510 mi | 1,122 km 697 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 156 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI | Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI
- Is 154 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 302 km (187 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 27 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























