Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016 Cupra 2.0 TSIvsSeat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon X-Perience
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 Cupra 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight202 hp/t151 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,423 kg3,137 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon III STFacelift 2016Cupra 2.0 TSI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,482kg3,267lb | 1,423kg3,137lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 48.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 64.3s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 202hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 775km481mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,548mm179in | 4,543mm179in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,431mm56in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,631mm104in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,536mm60in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 587L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,470L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 Cupra 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 2016Cupra 2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon III STFacelift 2016Cupra 2.0 TSI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 116 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 2016Cupra 2.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 Cupra 2.0 TSI has 110 hp more than Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI and Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 Cupra 2.0 TSI: 110 hp (82 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 2016Cupra 2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 2016Cupra 2.0 TSI | 1,482 kg 3,267 lb |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 1,423 kg 3,137 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 2016Cupra 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 2016Cupra 2.0 TSI | 4.9 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 Cupra 2.0 TSI and Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI: 2.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 2016Cupra 2.0 TSI | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 2016Cupra 2.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 2016Cupra 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon III STFacelift 2016Cupra 2.0 TSI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,482 kg 3,267 lb | 1,423 kg 3,137 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 775 km 481 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 Cupra 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 Cupra 2.0 TSI
- Has 110 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 69 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI
- Is 59 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























