Volvo V90
Car comparison
Volvo V90 2.0 D4vsSeat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions117 g/km
- Best estimated range1,222 km759 mi
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score95/100
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV902.0 D4 | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,882kg4,149lb | 1,380kg3,042lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,170km727mi Calculated | 1,222km759mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,936mm194in | 4,549mm179in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,526L | 1,470L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 124g/km | 117g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV902.0 D4 | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 D4 has 6 hp more than Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Volvo V90 2.0 D4: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 8.5 s |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
Although Volvo V90 2.0 D4 has more power, Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Volvo V90 2.0 D4: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,170 km 727 mi |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,222 km 759 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV902.0 D4 | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,170 km 727 mi | 1,222 km 759 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 124 g/km | 117 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V90 2.0 D4 | Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Is 502 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range
- Has 27 L more trunk volume
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























