Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIvsSeat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon III ST
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,415kg3,120lb |
| Gross weight | 1,945kg4,288lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.1s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated | 72.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.6s Calculated | 31.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 733km456mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,599mm181in | 4,535mm179in |
| Width | 1,769mm70in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,451mm57in | 1,451mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,528mm60in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 128mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,470L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | - |
| CO2 emissions | - | 112g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.6 s | 31.3 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI has 16 hp more than Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.8 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 733 km 456 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 112 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI | Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 18 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























