Seat Leon X-Perience
Car comparison
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDIvsSeat Leon III SC · Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon III SC · Facelift 2016
FR 2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,230 kg2,712 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions115 g/km
- Best estimated range1,136 km706 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,529kg3,371lb | 1,230kg2,712lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.3s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 83.4s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.2s Calculated | 46.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,122km697mi Calculated | 1,136km706mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,543mm179in | 4,246mm167in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,481mm58in | 1,431mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,599mm102in |
| Front track | 1,541mm61in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,503mm59in | 1,512mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 587L | 380L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 129g/km | 115g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.2 s | 46.7 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI has 34 hp more than Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 1,529 kg 3,371 lb |
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 7.1 s |
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 1,122 km 697 mi |
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 1,136 km 706 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.1 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,529 kg 3,371 lb | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,122 km 697 mi | 1,136 km 706 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 129 g/km | 115 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI | Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 207 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI
- Is 299 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 14 km (9 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 14 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























