Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016 2.0 TSIvsSeat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon III
FR 2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,309 kg2,886 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,111 km690 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,309kg2,886lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 84.1s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.5s Calculated | 33.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 1,111km690mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,549mm179in | 4,271mm168in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,444mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,634mm104in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,508mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 587L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,470L | 1,210L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 119g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.5 s | 33.7 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI has 6 hp more than Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 1,309 kg 2,886 lb |
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI and Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 806 km 501 mi |
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 1,111 km 690 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.5 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,309 kg 2,886 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 1,111 km 690 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 119 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI | Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 81 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 207 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 305 km (189 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























