Seat Leon III · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Seat Leon III · Facelift 2016 Cupra R 2.0 TSIvsSeat Leon IV 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon IV
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 Cupra R 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight225 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Seat Leon IV 1.5 TSI
- Lightest1,241 kg2,736 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range794 km493 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,378kg3,038lb | 1,241kg2,736lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 90.0s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.3s Calculated | 41.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 685km426mi Calculated | 794km493mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,324mm170in | 4,368mm172in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,435mm56in | 1,456mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,631mm104in | 2,686mm106in |
| Front track | 1,568mm62in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,543mm61in | 1,516mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,301L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 Cupra R 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon IV 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | 5,800-6,500 rpm | 1,800-5,700 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.3 s | 41.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | 310 hp 231 kW |
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 Cupra R 2.0 TSI has 160 hp more than Seat Leon IV 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon IV 1.5 TSI and Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 Cupra R 2.0 TSI: 160 hp (119 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | 1,378 kg 3,038 lb |
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI | 1,241 kg 2,736 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | 5.8 s |
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 Cupra R 2.0 TSI and Seat Leon IV 1.5 TSI: 2.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon IV 1.5 TSI and Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 Cupra R 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | 685 km 426 mi |
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI | 794 km 493 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.4 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 Cupra R 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016Cupra R 2.0 TSI | SeatLeon IV1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,378 kg 3,038 lb | 1,241 kg 2,736 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 685 km 426 mi | 794 km 493 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 Cupra R 2.0 TSI | Seat Leon IV 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 Cupra R 2.0 TSI
- Has 160 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 2.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 39 km/h (24 mph) higher top speed
- Has 104 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Seat Leon IV 1.5 TSI
- Is 137 kg lighter
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 109 km (68 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























