Seat Leon III · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Seat Leon III · Facelift 2016 2.0 TSIvsSeat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon X-Perience
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,122 km697 mi
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,269 kg2,798 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,269kg2,798lb | 1,529kg3,371lb |
| Gross weight | 1,870kg4,123lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.2s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.4s Calculated | 30.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 1,122km697mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,282mm169in | 4,543mm179in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,459mm57in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,503mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,210L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.4 s | 30.1 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI has 6 hp more than Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 1,269 kg 2,798 lb |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 1,529 kg 3,371 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 7.1 s |
Although Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI has more power, Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 806 km 501 mi |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 1,122 km 697 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.1 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TSI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,269 kg 2,798 lb | 1,529 kg 3,371 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 1,122 km 697 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI | Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TDI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 316 km (196 mi) more estimated range
- Has 207 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























