Seat Leon III SC · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Seat Leon III SC · Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDIvsSeat Leon III · Facelift 2016 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon III · Facelift 2016
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions110 g/km
- Best estimated range1,163 km723 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score95/100
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 1.5 TSI
- Lightest1,183 kg2,608 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score54/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,210kg2,668lb | 1,183kg2,608lb |
| Gross weight | 1,810kg3,990lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 83.0s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.6s Calculated | 46.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,163km723mi Calculated | 962km597mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,246mm167in | 4,282mm169in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,431mm56in | 1,459mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,599mm102in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,210L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 110g/km | 117g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.6 s | 46.5 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 1,210 kg 2,668 lb |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI | 1,183 kg 2,608 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 8.3 s |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI | 8.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 1.5 TSI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 1,163 km 723 mi |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI | 962 km 597 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,210 kg 2,668 lb | 1,183 kg 2,608 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,163 km 723 mi | 962 km 597 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 110 g/km | 117 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI | Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 201 km (125 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 1.5 TSI
- Is 27 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























